I tried both at a demo day and found the 55 gave me more feedback. It felt more connected, while the 65 had a bit more distance. It was a tough decision! Anyone else feel that way?
Definitely a tough choice! I’ve heard that combining them into a set could be an option. Anyone tried that? Curious how it performed for you!
I’ve been comparing the Mitsubishi Tensei AV Blue 55 and 65, and there’s a price difference of about $50. The 55 is more budget-friendly but the performance of the 65 may justify the extra cost for some golfers.
Absolutely! I feel like the 65 provides better stability and feel, which can translate into better shots on the course. Worth the price if you’re serious about your game!
For me, the 55 is perfect. It’s easier to get a little extra distance without as much effort, which is perfect for amping up my swing speed.
True! The 55 does cater well to those with moderate swing speeds. However, if you’re looking to optimize performance, the 65 is a solid choice as long as you can handle it.
I’m just curious, what specific features make the 65 worth the money? What’s the technology behind it?
The 65 has a unique multi-material design, which targets improved energy transfer. This can lead to a more consistent performance, especially at higher swing speeds.
I find the 55 tends to feel a bit more forgiving. If you’re not hitting fairways often, maybe spending extra on the 65 isn’t necessary. Value is subjective!
Feeling supportive here! Both shafts have their strengths. It honestly depends on your style and strategy. No one fits all!
Exactly! You could be the best golfer on your block and still prefer the 55 because it feels right. It’s such a personal choice.