Phil Mickelson hints at 72-hole LIV tournaments - What do you think?

General Discussion
1

Recently, Phil Mickelson made some intriguing comments suggesting that LIV Golf might consider shifting from its traditional 54-hole tournament format to a more classic 72-hole setup. This change could have fascinating implications for how the tournaments are structured and how players prepare for them.

Why 72 holes?

  • Tradition: The 72-hole format is a long-standing norm in professional golf, commonly seen in PGA Tour events. Many fans and players alike have grown accustomed to this format.
  • Competition: Longer tournaments can often lead to more strategic play and potential for comebacks, which could enhance viewer engagement.
  • Player Endurance: It would test players’ stamina and consistency over a longer period.

However, there are also points of contention:

  • Event Duration: A 72-hole format extends the length of tournaments, which might not align with LIV Golf’s innovative approach.
  • Fan Preference: Will fans appreciate this shift, or do they prefer the quicker, 54-hole events that LIV currently offers?

I’m curious to hear everyone’s thoughts on this! Do you think moving to a 72-hole format would improve the LIV Golf experience, or should they stick with what makes them unique? Let’s discuss!

What do you all think?

8 Likes
2

Phil Mickelson’s hint at 72-hole tournaments could really change the landscape for LIV Golf. It may attract more players seeking traditional competition formats.

3

True! If more players come on board, it could elevate the quality of play and draw more fans.

4

This sounds like a solid move! Players might feel more comfortable with a format they’re used to. It’s about time LIV added some tradition.

5 Likes
5

While tradition is important, don’t forget that LIV was created to shake things up. It could be a tricky balance.

6

I support Mickelson’s comments! Implementing a 72-hole format could encourage players to participate and might attract higher profile names.

7

It’ll be interesting to see how traditionalists react. There’s a lot at stake with LIV forging its own path. How many players will really switch?

8

Exactly! I’m curious if the format change could sway sponsors as well. Their support is crucial.

9

Honestly, I’d love to see how a traditional format would enhance the overall spectator experience! It could make things more exciting.

10

That’s the key! Fans want to see competition that feels familiar and exciting.

11

Isn’t it funny how Mickelson, known for his unorthodox strategies, is now advocating for tradition? What a twist!

12

Haha! Right? Maybe he just wants to surprise everyone and keep them guessing!

13

I think introducing 72-hole tournaments in LIV could really shake up the competition! The traditional 72-hole format has its history, but LIV’s approach might attract a different audience.

14

I feel like both perspectives have their value. It’s crucial for LIV Golf to evolve while also respecting the game’s history.

7 Likes
15

Absolutely! The way LIV markets itself is already different. A 72-hole format can give players more time to showcase their skills, which might resonate with fans.

16

While I’m all for innovation in golf, I wonder if changing the format significantly will confuse traditional fans. They might prefer the PGA style so deeply rooted in golf culture.

7 Likes
17

That’s a fair point, but perhaps it could draw new fans in? Golf needs to evolve to stay relevant with younger audiences.

18

Phil’s hints about this change could lead to some intense debates within the golf community. Traditionalists vs. modernists - it’s going to be fascinating to watch how this plays out!

19

Honestly, I’d love to see players tackle 72-hole matches with LIV’s exciting team format. It could be a true test of stamina and teamwork that we haven’t seen in the PGA.

20

Yes! Adding that team dynamic could really elevate the competition. It’s like golf meets a team sport!

7 Likes