Honestly, I’m just here for the debate and the laughs! But seriously, can different grips really change how we perceive the distance of our putts? I think it’s fascinating!
I’ve been using the SuperStroke 2.0 for over a year now, and the grip has held up surprisingly well! The materials resist wear and tear, and it’s easy to clean. I’d love to hear if others have experienced the same with the 3.0.
I agree! I’ve had the 3.0 for several months, and it looks as good as new. The rubber feels durable, and cleaning is a breeze, even after muddy rounds.
While both grips are great, I’ve noticed that my SuperStroke 2.0 shows some signs of wear on the edges after extensive use. Anyone else experienced this?
2 Likes
That’s interesting! I haven’t had that issue with my 3.0. It just feels like it ages much more gracefully than the 2.0.
4 Likes
In my experience, the 3.0 definitely has a more resistant finish. I found it easier to wipe down after rounds, and the grip still feels tacky even after numerous sessions.
Can anyone tell me how had their SuperStroke grips for in total? I’m curious if both versions maintain their quality for multiple seasons.
I’ve had my 3.0 for over two years, and it still feels great. Definitely more durable than I expected!
It sounds like the 3.0 wins on durability! I love the SuperStroke line, but I’m a bit concerned about the price difference. Is it really worth it?
For me, it is! The quality and longevity of the 3.0 grip make it a better investment in the long run. Plus, it maintains its performance much longer than the 2.0.
8 Likes